![]() ![]() If you believe Rowling’s efforts to promote a harmful view of trans people has a real impact on an already marginalised group, and you accept that her celebrity is almost entirely derived from the media franchise that began with Harry Potter, then support for one strengthens the other. Here it’s meant to imply that the harm done to trans people and others through the support of Wizarding World products is no more than the harm done by purchasing any of the dozens of other new games on the shelves, which is clearly untrue.Īll of this obfuscates a relatively clear moral equation. Whether that reading turns out to be warranted or not, it’s hardly unique to Rowling’s work as a criticism of fantasy fiction.Īside from those defending Rowling or overtly dismissing the harm her disseminations cause, the discussion around whether you can be a good ally while also enjoying this video game is playing out in social forums and comment sections all over the internet.Ī common argument is any spin on “no ethical consumption under capitalism”, which has become increasingly misused in recent years to justify consuming anything you want. ![]() ![]() On the other hand, you’ll also find arguments reaching to extrapolate Rowling’s controversial positions by painting the content of the game itself as bigoted critics have said the game perpetuates anti-Semitic stereotypes through its characterisation of goblins, and that it positions an enslaved race as the bad guys and the player character as a righteous coloniser. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |